The Jew and the Carrot » Blog Archive » Consider the Lobster (Even if it is Treif) - Voice of the New Jewish Food Movement

Consider the Lobster (Even if it is Treif)


We are a people of the book as much as we are a people of the fork, and no one – no one – in our generation was more gifted with words than David Foster Wallace, who died (of apparent suicide) this past Friday. Here, in memoriam, is a link to his beautiful, compassionate, soul-searching article on man’s relationship with food, “Consider the Lobster,” which gave rise to a same-titled collection of essays that are all worth reading.

Print This Post Print This Post

5 Responses to “Consider the Lobster (Even if it is Treif)”

  1. kristina Says:

    Hey, there’s a new website about to launch called Behind the Burner: it features exclusive tips on products and cooking techniques, as well as video demonstrations with New York City’s best chefs! Be sure to check out the website,, where you can sign up for email updates and more info.

  2. Michael Croland Says:

    Thanks for posting this. I remember reading that article in 2004 and just being shocked at how insightful it was and how great it was that the piece was in Gourmet of all places. David Foster Wallace made the point — better than most can — that we need to consider animals’ pain and suffering rather than just blindly consuming them without any regard for their interests.

  3. Adam Says:

    Still in disbelief at the news of his death. The new year is less sweet.

  4. Jeff Yoskowitz Says:

    He was one of the most gifted writers of our generation. Thanks, Eric, for recognizing his contributions. His collection of essays blew me away last year when I read them and now I plan to reread them all.

  5. produk huruf timbul Says:

    Whats up very cool blog!! Man .. Excellent .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your website and take the feeds additionally?I’m glad to seek out numerous helpful information right here in the publish, we need develop more techniques on this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .

Leave a Reply