Is it a Bris Without Bagels? Or, Halacha vs. Environmentalism
On Monday morning I, along with two of my Jewish farming colleagues, was lucky enough to attend a rural circumcision, my first. The father was a gentile, the mother Israeli, the hosts were not very observant, and neither were most of the guests. In fact, the three farmers in flannel were the most observant Jews there, with the exception of the Litchfield Chabad Rabbi and the Lubavitch Mohel (the circumciser).
The Bris seemed to be run almost entirely by the Mohel and the Rabbi, and it brought up some interesting questions. The mother was practically invisible (though, this might be understandable), and the father only slight less invisible. It was mostly a men’s event, which makes sense as we were welcoming this baby into the Jewish Boy’s Club. On the way over, one of my compatriots mentioned that the hosts had driven to Waterbury to get Kosher bagels for the Bris, which he thought was a bit much. Do they usually eat Kosher bagels? No, but this was for the Rabbi. At the Bris I heard questions such as, “If the coffee pot has only been used for coffee, is it kosher?”
After the ceremony it was, of course, time for the bagels and lox. Before we ate, the Rabbi implored us all to wash our hands and make a blessing together, in order to do a big mitzvah (commandment). Before we left, he led us all in a mildly disruptive Grace After Meals… disruptive because most of the men didn’t know the tune, weren’t interested in the prayer, and were probably turned off by it.
On the drive back to the farm we had a lot to think and talk about. My friend was upset because he felt that the parents had abdicated any role in the ritual and allowed it to be performed by a Rabbi that they barely knew. Additionally, they had to go out of their way for kosher bagels and other things. I noted that, for better or worse, many secular Israelis had taken that same attitude; when they get married, circumcised and buried, it’s by an Orthodox Rabbi, while during the rest of their lives they have almost no connection to Jewish ritual.
My friend wants the people to take back the ritual from the rabbinate since, after all, we aren’t a temple cult anymore. I’m not so sure. My respect for the Rabbis and scholars come from the fact (or idea) that they are holding themselves to a strict code of values that comes from Above, rather than a set of personal values. As rabbinic Jews, we cede the authority to the select few who are able to hold themselves to the standard that we (the laypeople) cannot achieve.
On the other hand, my environmental collegue has a set of values that he holds stricly which I respect as well. In fact, I respect it even more when I see him using a plastic plate, rather than offend the hosts and make a scene, even though he abhors the entire notion of disposable plates. But these paper plates are here only because the Chabad Rabbis won’t eat on the hosts plates! Here we see Jewish Law and Environmentalism coming into conflict.
Who is right? I have no idea. While I myself will compromise and eat vegetarian on the plates in a non-kosher home, I won’t compromise and eat non-kosher meat even when it is raised and slaughtered in a sustainable manner. I’m also not sure I want a Rabbi who makes compromises like that, because isn’t the idea of values (or at least religious values) that some are too important to bend. The Chabad Rabbis have the weight of thousands, or at least hundreds, of years of tradition behind their ritual, which is why these unaffilitated rural Jews are willing cede them control over their ritual life. They also don’t have muh experience with ritual on their own, which makes it easier to let someone else take care of it, especially when they have a big beard and hat.
Us Jewish farmers, on the other hand, take the idea of “taking back our ritual” very seriously, possibly even too far. We make blessings in a totally non-traditinal manner. My friend said he would have rather the Bris have been performed by a doctor with a poem read by the parents, if that was what would have gotten them involved, rather than just allowed someone else to do it all for them. I’m not so sure I would have preferred that kind of Bris, but I do wish that the parents had been able to take a more active role in their ritual life.
We need to find a compromise that answers the both questions: why we need Rabbis and Scholars, and why Rabbis and Scholars need us. I respect the Rabbi who’s doesn’t budge on Torah Values just because I know that my own values have changed and his have not. On the other hand, I like to think that my values have changed over time as I’ve grown older and wiser and I expect my values to continue to evolve; yet I expect the Rabbi to hold certain values steady, while also adapting when necessary. That’s a lot to ask for a Rabbi, especially if he wants to maintain both his integrity and his relationship with his congregants/students/etc. Maybe the Rabbis need to look back at a time in Jewish history (like ancient Babylonia) when the Rabbis were willing to make changes to some laws and while holding fast to others in response to the needs of the Jewish people as a whole. Sometimes I feel like todays Rabbis are trying so hard to toe the lines that were written for a Jewish people that is as far removed from the 21st century Jew as Pringles are from the potato that gave rise to it.
So what does it all mean? Should the hosts drive 2 hours out of the way for Kosher bagels and let the Chabad Rabbi do the Bris his way? Maybe, and maybe not. Should we refuse to eat the Kosher bagels because they are on plastic plates? I say of course not, but some might say yes. Should the parents have even hired a Rabbi from New York for the Bris when this kid might not see a Rabbi again until his Bar Mitzvah? I’m not so sure about this one, but I’d sure love to hear what you think about all these questions…
3 Responses to “Is it a Bris Without Bagels? Or, Halacha vs. Environmentalism”
-
Edith Stevenson Says:
February 7th, 2007 at 10:36 pmWhere does the tradition say one must have bagels at a bris!? If one is concerned about environmental issues, then driving 2 hours for one food item is counter to all that we believe in. Either SOMEONE coming to the blessed event could have picked up bagels on the way, or, a menu without bagels could be planned. If the parents were wheat intolerant, for example, they would not be eating bagels themselves, so why include them in the meal?
It seems inconsistant: traditions are important enough to the parents to have an offical bris (as opposed to just having the lad circumcised in the hospital by a doctor), yet respecting the traditions surrounding food seem not to be. Why worry about the boy not seeing a rabbi until 13 years later if connections with a Jewish community are not important all along the way? Who will the other 9 folks be to help them say Kaddish when the grandparents die? And the kid will become Bar Mitzvah by virtue of simply having 13 birthdays, not due to learning to read and comment upon Torah. All of these things lead to a good reason to respect traditions - you never know when one of them will become important, and most of them mesh nicely with organic vegetarian food consumption, recycling, bike riding, etc.
I did not grow up in a Kosher home, and still do not have one. But I respect those to whom it is important, and at the same time, appreciate it when they (my own Conservative Rabbi included) are willing to eat fish or vegetarian food at my home. Perhaps a more parent friendly rabbi would have also been a solution for these folks. I know I did not have a bris for my son when he was born, because it was not my family’s custom - in the 50’s, my brothers just had it done in the hospital, with no fanfare. Though we happened to have chosen a biblical name for our son, I sort of now regret that I didn’t know any rabbis at the time, nor thought to ask around for one. Being part of age old traditions can be very powerful and special.
-
Another Boy Says:
February 8th, 2007 at 5:22 pmI only once had a front row seat at a bris.
And although the baby was fine, I certainly needed a scotch afterwards…:-)
-
jp Says:
February 9th, 2007 at 4:21 pmHey Naf - Nice job! I very much enjoyed your article and the questions that you raised, particularly the ones about the value of change in the tradition.
The Orthodoxy, I think, plays an important role in keeping track of what we’ve learned and where we’ve been. And really its our long memory and these fences and traditions that allow us to remain Jewish (my father was a wandering aramean. he went down…). and what we have is unique and worth protecting. Without anyone taking a hard line it would be easy for us to drift, accepting new practices and mores too easily and eventually losing track of what we had and where we came from. Don’t disregard anything because the it is unknown the value of each mitzvah (pirke avoth, yes?).
-
The Conservative movement allows people to drive to Shul on Shabos, and my old Rabbi once argued that this is one of the biggest mistakes the movement has made - that the decision has lead to the dispersal of Jewish neighborhoods and the breakup of community. Seemingly harmless changes in halakah can make big trouble.
But this Orthodox steadfastness causes its own problems. When the feminist movement came with its list of true grievances it wasn’t the Orthodoxy who answered. The pressure pushed upwards through the movements and only now is Orthodoxy starting to address the question. I say that without the steps the other movements made the Orthodoxy would not address the question at all.
Every Pesach my family reads the story of the four children. Every year someone in my family or amongst our guests has to object to the response to the wicked child (set his teeth on edge?! what is this?) Both are important maybe. I wouldn’t erase the bit, but would be irresponsible to let it go unchallenged too.










