
The recent controversy regarding the custom of Kapparot (see article in the Forward) made me realize that Kapparot is virtually the only remaining ritual that uses an animal sacrifice as an atonement for human sin. In Temple times, any inadvertent sin had a corresponding animal sacrifice that was intended to cause the sinner to contemplate the nature of sin and how this animal is now losing its life instead of the sinner. pretty powerful stuff, if your environment is agrarian and animals are preciously traded commodities. Today however, things are much different.
Kapparot should be a solemn occasion, reminding people days before Yom Kippur that they are being spared from the theoretical cause-and-effect relationship of sin. In exchange for this, We are asked to reflect on life and it’s fragility; how it can be taken with one quick stroke of the blade. Instead though, we have turned it into a spectacle; children running around, playing with the livestock and us having little to no concern with their welfare. Traditionally we are supposed to even refrain from eating these chickens, donating them to charity instead. Fun and pleasure is not the name of the game.
Rather than eliminating the custom, perhaps those who feel strongly attached to this vestigial sacrifice should realize its depth and turn it into the solemn preparation for soul-cleansing that it really is. Those who choose to use a fish or money or other suitable replacement should not feel left out either; think about the words being said during the ceremony, and understand that this truly is a kapparah-an atonement for one’s sins over the past year. Maybe even think about sins committed against all creatures over the past year, and understand that the chicken-fish-money only counts as a repentance if it serves to focus us to repent.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.