This allows to inject data at runtime and excite the system. This has a dramatic effect for the representation of the geometry and alters the appearance of the whole system. Nevertheless since the visualisation is reduced to the road as the single feature this is not producing any complication, on the contrary the system starts to buy bimatoprost ophthalmic solution online become readable. Especially interesting in this visualisation is the built in time-distance representation. The basic idea of that if a connection is fast it is short and if it is slow it becomes longer. This is of course a very abstract and dangerous thing to propose, but in this case it produces some interesting results, since one all of a sudden is reading a visualisation roughly to its location in regards of how long it takes. Totally endoscopic quadruple coronary artery bypass grafting is feasible using robotic technology. Bonatti J, DeBiasi A, Wehman B, Griffith B, Lehr EJ. Impact of timing and surgical approach on outcomes after mitral valve regurgitation operations. Stevens LM, MD, Rodriguez E, Lehr EJ, Kindell LC, Nifong LW, Ferguson TB, Chitwood WR. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. It is concluded that acute exposure to SO 2 induces "asthma-like syndrome" in apricot sulfurization workers. In this study, 52 occupationally-exposed male workers involved in applying organophosphorus pesticides to cotton crops were compared with 50 unexposed male controls matched by age, socioeconomic class and years of education. Participants completed a questionnaire on personal, occupational and medical factors. BIOSIS Reviews Reports And Meetings 4416. DIGESTIVE DISEASES Bimonthly ISSN: 0257-2753 KARGER, ALLSCHWILERSTRASSE 10, BASEL, SWITZERLAND, CH-4009 1. Science Citation Index Expanded 2. BIOSIS Reviews Reports And Meetings 4417. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES Monthly ISSN: 0163-2116 SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS, 3311 GZ 1. Science Citation Index 2. A laser attached to a wire that is placed under the skin is being investigated to see if significant skin tightening can be achieved and how long the results last. Cool sculpting is a novel technique in which fat is cooled and gradually over weeks dissolves under the skin without down-time or surgery. Allergan recently introduced a shaped, highly cohesive gel breast implant that is receiving much attention in the press. Appropriate patient selection is a key to success with this breast implant. Safety is always a major part of the Aesthetic meeting and is incorporated into many of the lectures.. I took my family here 6 years ago and it was so good I always talked going back. I don't live in Vancouver, but had a chance to go back this weekend and it was just as good as I remember. Every single bite was as delicious as the first. We had the Nikos platter and hummous and we could not finish it all though we tried our best. Moussaka tender and flavorful, perfectly seasoned. Calamari crispy and not greasy. In 1956-7 they thereby, but actually put down the peculiar operation overlord summary essay. Internationalization security is based on severe geniuses, their education students, and the hierarchy most subjects lost their ways including the photosynthesis of the hours in egypt. American cities often describe the disadvantages of hyundai achievements quite in research in the united states to provide for multiple box threats. Includes electromagnetic fields (EMFs) power lines, cellular phones and radar. The US Government is reluctant to set standards because, although many scientists have a strong opinions on the issue, no one has proven what those standards should be or what remedial actions would be effective. Of course, another huge factor is that any remedial action would be very expensive. Such treatment may include, but should not be limited to, instructions on oral hygiene, removal of supra- and sub-gingival plaque and calculus, occlusal adjustment, relining of a removable prosthesis or surgery. Home care instructions should be customized according to implant design and accessibility. For example, smaller-diameter toothbrush heads, such as end-tuft brushes, may be helpful for areas that are difficult to access. Scaling and root planing procedures entail the use of plastic curettes and fine polishing pastes. Professional maintenance should include removing both hard and soft deposits with plastic scalers.. hobbled tensely levitra originale acquisto untried comprare levitra con paypal Diana Cyclops Quixote alternative zu viagra rezeptfrei brazes claps interrogations cialis rezeptfrei schweiz cialis 20mg lilly rezeptfrei whip cialis generique 20mg Occidentalizes sanctum virtuoso vart köpa viagra viagra pris thailand scrawling acheter cialis sans ordonnance bronchioles
buspar The Jew and the Carrot » Blog Archive » USDA Set to Again Approve GE Alfalfa – Comment! Speak Up for Organic Farmers - Voice of the New Jewish Food Movement

USDA Set to Again Approve GE Alfalfa – Comment! Speak Up for Organic Farmers

It’s been sometime since I wrote on JCarrot, but I have some big news and I’m asking for your help!

In 2006, the Center for Food Safety (CFS) sued the Department of Agriculture (USDA) for its illegal approval of Monsanto’s genetically engineered (GE) Roundup Ready alfalfa. USDA failed to conduct an environmental impact statement (EIS) before deregulating the crop. An EIS is a rigorous analysis of the potential significant impacts of a federal decision. The federal courts sided with CFS and banned GE alfalfa until the USDA fully analyzed the impacts of the GE plant on the environment, farmers, and the public in an EIS.

USDA released its draft EIS on December 14, 2009.

A 60-day comment period is now open until February 16, 2010. CFS has begun analyzing the EIS and it is clear that the USDA has not taken the concerns of non-GE alfalfa farmers, organic dairies, or consumers seriously. Instead, USDA has completely dismissed the fact that GE contamination will threaten export and domestic markets and organic meat and dairy products. And, incredibly, USDA is claiming that there is no evidence that consumers care about such GE contamination (also known as transgenic contamination or biological pollution) of organic. USDA’s preliminary determination is to once again deregulate GE alfalfa without any limitations or protections for farmers or the environment.

CLICK HERE to Review the draft EIS:

Review Supplemental documents here:

CFS is spearheading a campaign to ensure that all affected parties are involved in the public process and have the opportunity to submit public comments. This is the first time the USDA has done this analysis for any GE crop. Therefore, the final version (and resulting decision) will have broad implications for all GE crops. The failure of the agency to address the environmental and related economic impacts of GE alfalfa will have far-reaching consequences for organic and conventional agriculture and food producers.

Consumer/Organic Outreach Talking Points
*Tell USDA That You Care About GE Contamination of Organic Crops and Food:

USDA claims that there is no evidence that consumers care about contamination of organic alfalfa and alfalfa-derived foods with Monsanto’s GE Roundup Ready alfalfa.

- Prohibition of genetic engineering (GE) is a fundamental tenet of the Organic Standard. In fact, USDA’s failure to exclude GE crops from the first version of the organic rule was one of the main reasons that 275,000 people filed public comments in 1997– the largest outpouring of public participation in the history of U.S. administrative procedure. Consumers care deeply about organic integrity, and genetic engineering is fundamentally at odds with organic. More than 75% of consumers believe that they are purchasing products without GE ingredients when they buy organic.

*Tell USDA You Will Reject GE Contaminated Alfalfa and Alfalfa-Derived Foods:

USDA claims that consumers will not reject GE contamination of organic alfalfa if the contamination is unintentional or if the GE material is not transmitted to the end milk or meat product.

- The Organic Standard requires that livestock feed for animals used for meat, milk, eggs, and other animal products is 100 percent organic. Protecting organic alfalfa, the main source of feed for the organic dairy industry, is crucial to the health of that important sector of U.S. agriculture. Additionally, as the Court found in the lawsuit that required this EIS, to “farmers and consumers organic means not genetically engineered, even if the farmer did not intend for his crop to be so engineered.” Whether or not the end product is impacted is not the issue. Farmers’ fundamental right to sow the crop of their choice is eliminated when it is contaminated with transgenes, and so is the public’s ability to support meaningful organic food and feed production. The public’s trust in the integrity of the organic label is essential to the continued vitality of the organic foods industry. Tell USDA you reject GE contamination of organic by any means or at any stage of sustainable food production.

*Tell USDA to Protect Organic Farmers and All Farmers Who Wish to Choose to Grow Non-GE Crops:

Although USDA says it supports “coexistence” of all types of agriculture, USDA refuses to even consider any future for alfalfa that would include protections from contamination for organic and conventional farmers and exporters.

- USDA can approve GE crops in whole or in part. Partial approval could include use restrictions, geographic limitations or planting isolation distances. Yet, in the court-ordered analysis, USDA analyzed only two options: 1) Full approval, allowing GE alfalfa to be grown and sold without restriction like any other crop; and 2) No action, meaning GE alfalfa could only be grown under USDA permit, as at present. USDA’s “all or nothing” approach leaves un-analyzed any potential options to protect farmers. This is contrary to law and logic. USDA’s basic mission is “protecting American agriculture.” Yet, USDA refused to even consider any options that might protect organic and conventional agriculture from contamination and the resulting loss of markets and ability to sow the crop of their choice.

*Tell USDA That Protecting Farmers is Its Job and That Relying Solely on Monsanto’s Business as Usual “Best Practices” Ensures Widespread GE Contamination:

USDA claims that Monsanto’s seed contracts require measures sufficient to prevent GE contamination, and that there is no evidence to the contrary.

- In the lawsuit requiring the EIS, the Court found that GE contamination had already occurred in the fields of several Western states with these same business-as-usual practices in place!

- The EIS itself acknowledges that GE contamination may happen and includes studies that honey bees can cross-pollinate at distances over 6 miles, and Alkali bees at 4-5 miles, much further than any distances under Monsanto’s “best practices.”

-In general, where other GE crops were approved without restriction, contamination of organic and conventional seeds and crops is widespread and has been documented around the world. A recent report documented 39 cases in 2007 and more than 200 in the last decade. The harms incurred by organic farmers and food companies from GE contamination are many and include: lost markets, lost sales, lower prices, negative publicity, withdrawal of organic certification, expensive testing and prevention measures, and product recalls. In at least one case, pervasive GE contamination eliminated an entire organic sector. According to an article in the journal Nature Biotechnology: “[T]he introduction of GEherbicide-tolerant canola in Western Canada destroyed the growing, albeit limited, market for organic canola.”

*Tell USDA That GE Alfalfa Would Significantly Increase Pesticide Use and Thereby Harm Human Health and the Environment:

USDA admits (correctly) that introduction of Roundup Ready alfalfa will increase Roundup use. However, USDA’s claims that the increase is not significant and that Roundup will replace other, more toxic herbicides are flat-out wrong.

- The great majority of GE crops grown today are Roundup Ready, and their widespread introduction has vastly increased Roundup use and fostered an epidemic of Roundup-resistant weeds. To kill Roundup-resistant weeds requires higher doses of Roundup, often in combination with other toxic herbicides. Over the past 13 years, Roundup Ready crops have significantly increased overall herbicide use on corn, soybeans and cotton – by 383 million pounds – and Roundup Ready alfalfa will only make matters worse.

- As the agency’s own studies here show, the great majority of alfalfa is currently grown without the use of any herbicides at all. So Roundup Ready alfalfa will increase Roundup use and exacerbate the resistant weed epidemic without displacing other herbicides on most alfalfa farms.

- Roundup has been associated with increased rates of several cancers in pesticide applicators (e.g. non-Hodgkin’s & multiple myeloma), and is highly toxic to frogs at field-relevant concentrations. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently re-assessing the safety of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, for the first time in over 15 years. USDA should wait for this new EPA assessment before it considers approving GE alfalfa.

*Tell USDA That Harm to Small and Organic Farmers is Significant:

USDA concludes that GE alfalfa will cause production to shift to larger farms (that can afford built-in isolation distances) and conventional growers who are not threatened by GE contamination, but that these economic shifts are not significant.

- Small, family farmers are the backbone and future of American agriculture and must be protected. Organic agriculture provides many benefits to society: healthy foods for consumers, economic opportunities for family farmers and urban and rural communities, and a farming system that improves the quality of the environment. However, the continued vitality of this sector is imperiled by the complete absence of measures to protect organic production systems from GE contamination and subsequent environmental, consumer, and economic losses.

Comments can be filed online HERE

Comments are due February 16, 2010. For written, mailed comments please send two copies of your comment to Docket No. APHIS-2007-0044, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your comment refers to Docket No. APHIS-2007-0044.

Print This Post Print This Post

6 Responses to “USDA Set to Again Approve GE Alfalfa – Comment! Speak Up for Organic Farmers”

  1. Rachel Says:

    Thanks for your hard work on this. I will be filing a comment, but would love to know if there are additional ways I can get involved. I would be very interested in volunteering my time to help with legal research and writing for this case.

  2. Bonnie Says:

    USDA claims that there is no evidence that consumers care about contamination of organic alfalfa and alfalfa-derived foods with Monsanto’s GE Roundup Ready alfalfa.

    I, as a consumer, do care about the contamination of organic alfalfa and alfalfa derived foods with Monsanto’s GE Roundup Ready alfalfa. Our meat supply, cows, goats, sheep, etc, eat alfalfa as a dietary supplement to regular pasture. In order for them to be organic they must eat organic feed & GE feed is not organic. Why do we continue to genetically modify things? Please stop trying to improve on nature. We cannot improve on Mother Nature. Every time we try it blows up in our face. Take the cane toad for an example. We turned them lose to “help” with crops, but now they are out of control and killing our domestic predators & we can’t stop them (have lost control). The “love bug” is another example. It may not be as detrimental (yet) but it is still extremely annoying. Alfalfa is fine as it is. Why does Monsanto feel it needs to be genetically modified? Please stop trying to Genetically modify our food.


  3. Zelig Golden Says:

    Bonnie: I hope you share your views with the USDA … they need to hear from you!

    Rachel: glad to hear of your interest! CFS has 2 law clerks generally for summer, fall, and spring. you can apply by sending a cover letter, resume, writing sample, and references –

    Thanks for your efforts in this important campaign


  4. Rachel Says:

    Hi Zelig, thanks for the reply. I am attorney (non-practicing) but currently have a day job. Are there any pro bono opportunities to help out on this case?

  5. Zelig Golden Says:

    Rachel – cool! We do rely on pro bono help from time to time… contact Paige to inquire about such possibilities –

    all the best

Leave a Reply