
I recently heard an interview with Native artist Lawrence Paul Yuxweluptun during which he made a comment about the nature of food. He asked “When a Haida is eating a hotdog When does the hotdog become Haida (referring to the first nations band)? When it’s in his hand? When it’s in his mouth? or after he’s had a bowel movement.” Yuxweluptun was using this image as a metaphor for many cultural dilemmas. I ended up stuck on the Koan-like statement for a while trying to grapple with what about the metaphor hit me. I think it stems from the possibility of thinking about it from a literal perspective and then approach food and culture differently. When does what we eat become who we are, if it even ever does.
Stepping back from what food is, I asked myself what food does. Food aside from acting as a social gathering point, or as a staple of any economic system, gives us pleasure, and fuels what we do. I would like to focus on these last two, seeing as they more accurately define why we need food. Once we approach food in this way it is easier to think about its central role in our life. Can we take the first point and place it at the centre of our food world? Only if we want to be labeled as an epicure (see my previous blog post). Sure, we like the taste of food and I firmly believe that it is there to be enjoyed, but there must be more to it. The food-as-fuel model not only complements this approach, it also fits in nicely with what we are looking for in terms of an answer to the dilemma. Why do we say that you are what you eat and can we actually have an answer to when does the food become us.
I think it is a fair bet to say that food-as-fuel is an idea that is fairly self-evident. You eat, you feel energized, you don’t you (eventually) die. The question then is what do we do with the energy that food gives us. We can choose to use it to better ourselves, others, and the world; or we can do nothing with it, choosing to waste the day unproductively. Worse, we can even choose to use our energies towards ngative activities. As humans we care about these things because our deeds often define us. We tend to admire people whose works we approve of, and rebuff people whose actions we find unconscionable. In essence, we are what we do.
If we accept that premise then it is not difficult to see that we are what we eat. What we eat allows us to do what we do. In that sense, the hotdog (or the bok choi or the cholent) becomes us when we choose to do something with it. When our caloric intake becomes a miztva (or an hour watching TV) we have transformed the food into something that will be remembered.
Whether you want your deeds to be remembered as having started as a hotdog, or a beautiful challah I will leave for you to decide.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.